Foreign ministers of G7 nations exceeded their differences on Friday Ukraine Territorial and warned integrity Russia Follow Kiev when accepting a ceasefire or facing possible sanctions.
His joint statement followed weeks of tension between American allies and President Donald Trump for his actions of Western trade policy, security and Ukraine-related policy.
Trump urged Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday to save on Friday that Ukrainian troops were expelled from the Kursk region of Russia, and said that there was a « very good opportunity » that the war could end.
Trump published on social media after his envoy, Steve Witkoff, held a long meeting with Putin on Thursday night in Moscow that Trump described as « very good and productive. »
Kremlin said Putin had sent Trump a message about his cessation plan, which Kiev has accepted, through Witkoff, expressing « prudent optimism » that an agreement could be reached to end the three -year conflict.
Putin said on Thursday that he supported Trump’s proposal in principle, but that the struggle could not be stopped until various crucial conditions were elaborated, increasing the perspective of longer negotiations.
The Secretary of State of the United States, Marco Rubio, told journalists after the G7 meetings that there were reasons to be « cautiously optimistic » about a cessation of fire and peace negotiations after Putin’s statements, but would not address his declared conditions.
G7 officials had feared that they could disagree in a document that touched everything that touched geopolitical issues around the world, divisions that said they could have played in Russia and China.
Get daily national news
Get the main holders of the current political, economic and current news, delivered to your inbox once a day.
« When it comes to different issues, Ukraine and Middle East, we have had sessions talking about these different topics, topics, and the goal was to keep the G7 strong unity, » the Canadian minister said Melanie Joly.
The group of seven ministers from Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the United States, together with the European Union, was called for the remote tourist city of Malbie, located on the Quebec hills, for meetings on Thursday and Friday that have been widely agreed in the past.
But at the first G7 meeting of the Canada presidency, the elaboration of an agreed final statement had been difficult with the love of the language on Ukraine, the Middle East and the desire for Washington of the most hard writing in China.
The statement « reaffirmed its unmatched support to Ukraine to defend its territorial integrity and its right to exist, and its freedom, sovereignty and independence. »
Ukraine’s territorial integrity has been largely absent from the United States narrative since the Trump administration reached power on January 20. The United States under Trump so far have not ruled out the possibility that Kiev could cede the territory.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said that the question of the territory was discussed on Friday during a meeting of Ukrainian and North -American officials in the Saudi city of Jeddah, but would require a difficult dialogue.
« Territorial integrity is an important element of the statement and reference to the United Nations, » Kaja Kallas told Reuters, in reference to a call to a « complete, durable and lasting peace according to the United Nations Charter. »
An earlier text referring to the need for security guarantees to ensure that a truce was replaced by « insurance », but warned Moscow to follow Kiev by agreeing to a ceasefire or cope with more sanctions, including oil caps.
« G7 members requested that Russia be launched by agreeing to a cessation of the fire in equal terms and fully implementing it.
« They emphasized that any cessation of the fire must be respected and emphasized the need for robust and credible security provisions to ensure that Ukraine can deter and defend any act of renewed aggression, » they said in a reference to the territorial integrity of Ukraine.
British Foreign Secretary David Lammy called the statement « very good ».
Washington had sought to impose red lines on Ukraine language so as not to harm his conversations with Russia, and opposed a separate statement to curb the so -called Russian shadow fleet, an darkened shipping network that eludes sanctions, while also demanding more robust language in China.
In the end, the G7 also approved a separate statement on maritime safety, including a working group to deal with the shadow fleet, which Canada had promoted.
The final statement stated the G7 opposition to any unilateral attempt to change the status quo in the Taiwan Strait by force or coercion, a language that will probably encourage Taipei.
There had been a language on Gaza and the Middle East, especially the notion of solving two states for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which resisted the United States.
The final version did not mention a solution of two states, leaving a language that had emphasized its importance in the previous drafts of the text.
« They emphasized the imperative of a political horizon for the Palestinian people, achieved through a solution negotiated to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that satisfies the legitimate needs and aspirations of the two peoples and advances the peace, stability and prosperity of the Middle East, » the project read.
—He’s additional files of Global News and Reuters
Leave a Reply