His trial may be shown sadly known videos « freaks »


Sean « Didi » Combs« The legal team has submitted a list of proposed issues for potential jury, hinting at his infamous » Frak-Off « can be presented as evidence if his lawsuit begins next month.

A questionnaire that contained inspection issues 70 will help them determine the view of potential jury on sexually obvious videos, videos showing physical attacks, and their opinions with several sexual partners.

In the upcoming trial, Sean « Didi » Kombs is face with federal charges Conspiracy racket, two articles on sex trafficking and two transportation articles to participate in prostitution.

The article continues below advertising

Why Didi’s lawyer wants the potential jurors to fill out the questionnaire

Sean "View" Combs
Mega

On the eve of the future trial of Diddz, his lawyers presented the proposed questionnaire, which would be filled with potential jurors.

It is reported that the questionnaire contains more than 70 verification issues, some with several units.

In the accompanying letter to the trial, the legal team explained the reasoning that stand for the questions, stating that they sought to evaluate the readiness of potential jurors to view videos containing sexually obvious content or images of physical attack, in accordance with The story press.

They also noted the intention to evaluate the views of the jurors on people who had several sexual partners.

The article continues below advertising

The questionnaire hints at the fact that during the trial the video « Diddi with » will be shown

Sean P. Didi Kombs on the 77th Academy Award on Sunday, February 27, 2005 at Kodak Theater in Hollywood, California.
Mega

The last step of the lawyer Didi strongly suggested that the « Frak-Off » video could be shown as evidence during the trial.

At the beginning of last year, a video was obtained, which was referred to during a Diddi’s home raid and played a significant role in providing charges.

They were also described as « complex and made sexual performances » with the participation of women’s chirs and men’s prostitutes.

The article continues below advertising

Didi’s legal team failed to reach a consensus about the questionnaire

Sean Kombs P.Didi saw a business meeting for the uprising
Mega

According to the exit, the lawyers Didi presented a questionnaire without blessings of prosecutors.

Both sides could not reach the consensus in that it should contain, and the defense claims that the potential juror should be allowed to write freely about « unprecedented and negative attention of the media » that surround the Didi, which may have been « exposed ».

This includes whether the potential jurors will have to view critical programs about Diddy after his arrest, such as « Didi’s fall, » « Didi does it? » « Fall Didi » and « Didi: Create a bad boy. »

The article continues below advertising

In her letter, the prosecutor’s office wrote that the proposed questions « are not at all involved in the ability to serve. » They also claimed that the questionnaire was too long, which could lead to insufficient answers.

Once the court decides, the final list of issues will be distributed by the end of April and submitted ahead of the Voir Dire process, during which both the defense and the prosecutor’s office will question the jury.

The article continues below advertising

Raper’s lawyers call on prosecutors to limit the testimony of the four alleged victims named in charge

Didi combed with their key to New York
Mega

Earlier in a week, lawyers Didi took a step to deprive any witness who testify except the four alleged victims named in the rapper’s federal charge.

« The court should demand from the government to try the case he accused and proved that the jury is beyond reasonable doubts, » the lawyers said in the application received in Daily mail.

They added: « The government should not be allowed to contaminate the lawsuit for decades of dirt and invite persuasions based on the evidence without the proper purpose, staining Mr. Combs as a bad guy who probably committed the accused crimes. »

Next, claiming its case, the defense claimed that the prosecutor’s office refused to grow witnesses by April 18, which would seem to leave them unprepared so that the jury will only take place in two weeks.

The article continues below advertising



Source link

Leave a Reply

Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *