Langley, near the CIA headquarters in Virginia, is a statue known as Kryptos. Since 1990, it has been there and contains four hidden code – three resolved. Final has passed 35 years without encryption. And according to a String reportThe responsible sculptor does not know that everyone does not deal with a chatbot that everyone is damn.
Sculptures and National Oceans and Atmospheres for the Massachusetts Technology Institute and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, in addition to the work outside the CIA HQ, K4, K4, KNOTT techniques were flooded with people who solved the final panel. However, this code crackers are not a true cryptanalyst, professional or otherwise obsessed by coding the message for the first appearance. No, they are some people who manage the code through a chatbot and have the word with the answer.
One Chat with stringSanborn, if you have already been 79 years old, 79 years old, after a decline in ten years in a decline, it has already been annoying, he said that he has already been annoying Start paying $ 50 To review the solutions, you have been given a lot of cranks for years for years. However, according to Sanborn, it is worse than the frequency of submissions, the attitude of those who present.
« The nature of the emails is different – the code cracks with the AI convinced that they broke the kryptos during breakfast, » he said. « So they all reassured him so they broke him after reaching me. »
Several examples of extremely arrogant and unique messages in recent years:
« I’m just a veterinarian … cracked on the days with the grock. »
« I couldn’t do 35 years and even the NSA’s resources, I could not do 3 hours before my morning coffee. »
« History has been re-written … no error cracked 100%. »
Especially if you have spent any time on social media in X, you saw these people. Maybe the same guys, the same boy. You know, « just do it » or responds to someone’s post « what grock here » or share a screenshot as the additive added in any way in the conversation.
Imperfection, open, inexpressible. Although they succeed the Sanborn code, they ask AI (for a record, Sanborn, Sanborn), what is asking for a machine that creates such satisfaction? It would be something to prepare a wide-lingual model in an endless amount of encryption knowledge and to break the Sanborn code used. But these are as if they ask a conversation to look at and solve a picture. Is the least smart thing that can be imagined. In addition to this work, it slides behind the textbook to see what the correct solution to the mathematical equation, in this case, the textbook response is confident.
This behavior is not uncommon, really. A study published in the magazine last year Computers in human behavior When people admonish their advice, they even tend to trust them, even to convince them to persuade them to contradictory contextual information and their personal interests. The same research has a negative impact on the interaction of the interaction with other people when someone trusts the advice of the EU. Perhaps because they are happy with themselves because they are so damn.
Leave a Reply